🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.